Forbes calls Star Citizen’s development "mismanagement on a galactic scale" and fans aren't happy
The article closely follows the development of Star Citizen and also gives us some insights in Chris Roberts personal life. The summary is quite harsh as the game was originally intended to be finished back in 2014. Now we are in 2019 and the game has raised close to $300 mil. via Kickstarter and other in-game purchases and it's not eve close to being finished. Roberts promised backers a "vast, playable universe with 100 star systems.” Not one of these systems are finished and the game boasts for now "two mostly finished planets, nine moons and an asteroid". Moreover Forbes calls the whole dev process "is incompetence and mismanagement on a galactic scale":
This is not fraud—Roberts really is working on a game—but it is incompetence and mismanagement on a galactic scale. The heedless waste is fueled by easy money raised through crowdfunding, a Wild West territory nearly free of regulators and rules. Creatives are in charge here, not profit-driven bean counters or deadline-enforcing suits.
Forbes have also talked to 20 former employees at Cloud Imperium (the company Roberts created for developing SC) and they "depict Roberts as a micromanager and poor steward of resources":
“As the money rolled in, what I consider to be some of [Roberts’] old bad habits popped up—not being super-focused,” says Mark Day, a producer on Wing Commander IV who runs a company that was contracted to do work on Star Citizen in 2013 and 2014. “It had got out of hand, in my opinion. The promises being made—call it feature creep, call it whatever it is—now we can do this, now we can do that. I was shocked.”
Of course fans retaliated on reddit and called the news article a hit piece against Star Citizen and also attacked the 2 writers:
Forbes has two 'journalists' review a video game which raised $300M but offers no financial analysis. Who the f--k cares what Forbes thinks of video games?
Matt Perez, first named author, apparently also writes for IGN, polygon and PC gamer.
The other author "follows the money", but where's any material on the financials?
Seems more like a piece for IGN, polgon, or PC Gamer, but they all turned it down.
However Forbes' article lines up with what other publications had to say about Star Citizen's development over the years. Kotaku called the project in 2016 an " unwieldy, ever-changing dream project" and said that the game's development has been troubled.